<mods:mods xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:METS="http://www.loc.gov/METS/" xmlns:fits="http://hul.harvard.edu/ois/xml/ns/fits/fits_output" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:IR="http://dl.lib.brown.edu/md/irdata" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:rights="http://cosimo.stanford.edu/sdr/metsrights/" ID="etd138">
     <mods:titleInfo>
      <mods:title>The Promise of Art and the Problem of Difference: Aesthetic Universalism in Romantic-Era Britain</mods:title>
     </mods:titleInfo>
     <mods:name type="personal">
      <mods:namePart>Chander, Manu Samriti</mods:namePart>
      <mods:role>
       <mods:roleTerm type="text">creator</mods:roleTerm>
      </mods:role>
     </mods:name>
     <mods:originInfo>
      <mods:copyrightDate keyDate="yes" encoding="w3cdtf">2009</mods:copyrightDate>
     </mods:originInfo>
     <mods:physicalDescription>
      <mods:extent>vi, 134 p.</mods:extent>
      <mods:digitalOrigin>born digital</mods:digitalOrigin>
     </mods:physicalDescription>
     <mods:note>Thesis (Ph.D.) -- Brown University (2009)</mods:note>
     <mods:name type="personal">
      <mods:namePart>Keach, William</mods:namePart>
      <mods:role>
       <mods:roleTerm type="text">director</mods:roleTerm>
      </mods:role>
     </mods:name>
     <mods:name type="personal">
      <mods:namePart>Bewes, Timothy</mods:namePart>
      <mods:role>
       <mods:roleTerm type="text">reader</mods:roleTerm>
      </mods:role>
     </mods:name>
     <mods:name type="personal">
      <mods:namePart>Chow, Rey</mods:namePart>
      <mods:role>
       <mods:roleTerm type="text">reader</mods:roleTerm>
      </mods:role>
     </mods:name>
     <mods:name type="personal">
      <mods:namePart>George, Olakunle</mods:namePart>
      <mods:role>
       <mods:roleTerm type="text">reader</mods:roleTerm>
      </mods:role>
     </mods:name>
     <mods:name type="corporate">
      <mods:namePart>Brown University. English</mods:namePart>
      <mods:role>
       <mods:roleTerm type="text">sponsor</mods:roleTerm>
      </mods:role>
     </mods:name>
     <mods:genre authority="aat">theses</mods:genre>
     <mods:abstract>This dissertation examines the post-Enlightenment concept of aesthetic universalism as it figures in British art and literature of the late-eighteenth and early-nineteenth
      centuries. During the Romantic era, I argue, the belief in the potential for art to bring about universal accord comes to structure both real and imaginary relations between subjects, between
      audiences, and, crucially, between "the West and the rest." Drawing on recent scholarship on Romantic Orientalism, I show how aesthetics and Orientalism form a unified project wherein a
      universalist understanding of subjectivity, paradoxically coded along lines of race and nation, is articulated. Romantic aesthetics, beginning with Kant, describes this subjectivity, and
      Romantic Orientalism, as an aesthetic, makes visible the systematic exclusion of the Other from the category of the universal. In Chapter 1, I locate the historical roots of modern universalism
      within the persistent aesthetic controversies?such as the "Pope controversy" and the controversy over the Lyrical Ballads?of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, offering a close reading of
      S.T. Coleridge's "Fears in Solitude." My second chapter shows how Thomas De Quincey's Confessions of an English Opium-Eater mobilizes aesthetic universalism and Orientalism toward the creation
      of an imagined national identity. In Chapter 3, I discuss the Orientalist aesthetics of Percy Shelley's Alastor and of David Roberts's lithographed images of the Near East. Specifically, I read
      their common strategy of "framing" as a means of foreclosing the Oriental Other, and I foreground the ideological particularism that underlies their universalist visions. My concluding section
      considers the possibilities for Romantic aesthetics to unwork the very ideological investments identified above. Reading Kant's analysis of beauty in the Critique of Judgment next to Keats's
      "Ode on a Grecian Urn," I show how the category of the beautiful offers up an ethical alternative to the understandings of cultural difference that were forged in the Romantic era and that have
      persisted throughout the modern age.</mods:abstract>
     <mods:subject authority="local">
      <mods:topic>universality</mods:topic>
     </mods:subject>
     <mods:subject authority="FAST" authorityURI="http://id.worldcat.org/fast" valueURI="http://id.worldcat.org/fast/1100133"><mods:topic>Romanticism</mods:topic></mods:subject><mods:subject authority="FAST" authorityURI="http://id.worldcat.org/fast" valueURI="http://id.worldcat.org/fast/798702"><mods:topic>Aesthetics</mods:topic></mods:subject><mods:subject authority="FAST" authorityURI="http://id.worldcat.org/fast" valueURI="http://id.worldcat.org/fast/1048139"><mods:topic>Orientalism</mods:topic></mods:subject><mods:recordInfo>
      <mods:recordContentSource authority="marcorg">RPB</mods:recordContentSource>
      <mods:recordCreationDate encoding="iso8601">20091218</mods:recordCreationDate>
     </mods:recordInfo>
    <mods:language><mods:languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</mods:languageTerm><mods:languageTerm type="text">English</mods:languageTerm></mods:language><mods:identifier type="doi">10.7301/Z0R20ZQK</mods:identifier><mods:accessCondition type="rights statement" xlink:href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/">In Copyright</mods:accessCondition><mods:accessCondition type="restriction on access">Collection is open for research.</mods:accessCondition><mods:typeOfResource authority="primo">dissertations</mods:typeOfResource></mods:mods>