Title Information
Title
Civil Society and the Potential for Solidarity: Toward a Critical Sociology of Post-socialist Chinese Society
Name: Personal
Name Part
Zhou, Mujun
Role
Role Term: Text
creator
Origin Information
Copyright Date
2015
Physical Description
Extent
ix, 238 p.
digitalOrigin
born digital
Note
Thesis (Ph.D. -- Brown University (2015)
Name: Personal
Name Part
Kennedy, Michael
Role
Role Term: Text
Director
Name: Personal
Name Part
Heller, Patrick
Role
Role Term: Text
Reader
Name: Personal
Name Part
Itzigsohn, Jose
Role
Role Term: Text
Reader
Name: Personal
Name Part
Elliot, Gregory
Role
Role Term: Text
Reader
Name: Personal
Name Part
Schrank, Andrew
Role
Role Term: Text
Reader
Name: Corporate
Name Part
Brown University. Sociology
Role
Role Term: Text
sponsor
Genre (aat)
theses
Abstract
This study investigates both the opportunities and constraints for civil society in China to effect political change. Diverging from the dominant approach of state-society relations, my study explores the possibility of solidarity. Solidarity is defined as a political culture that imposes obligations on individuals to have an “enlarged mentality” in political participation. Based on interviews with 106 civil society activists and participant observations, I provide a historicist account on how the idea of civil society has been introduced to China after the student movement, and how this discourse has been translated across the boundary between the academy and social activisms. My argument is that, although civil society activisms in China are becoming increasingly vibrant, the development of a solidary sphere is still largely constrained. I demonstrate how specific political arrangements of the state, the market, and the internal structure of civil society have inhibited the development of a solidary sphere along three dimensions in particular – concrete networks, categorical identities, and public deliberations. With respect to the state, I show how the legacy of communist rule, which defines the party-state as the final arbiter for consensus formation, is still consequential for activisms in civil society. Although citizens have been granted opportunities to voice their particular demands, or even participate in public deliberations, they have been deprived of the opportunities to reflect upon their position in the system, and establish solidary relations with other members in the political community. With respect to the market, I demonstrate that, although commercial powers in the market could provide activists in civil society with critical resources, in some occasions, these powers could also become inimical to the formation of solidarity. Additionally, I argue that the tensions between intellectuals and social movements, and between protests and organizations have also made solidarity less likely to develop. In the end, I also identify approaches intellectuals and activists can use to extend solidarity. Theoretically, this study aims at deepening our understanding on the political consequence of authoritarianism, and the relationship between civil society and political change.
Subject
Topic
activist
Subject (FAST) (authorityURI="http://id.worldcat.org/fast", valueURI="http://id.worldcat.org/fast/862876")
Topic
Civil society
Subject (FAST) (authorityURI="http://id.worldcat.org/fast", valueURI="http://id.worldcat.org/fast/1125481")
Topic
Solidarity
Subject (FAST) (authorityURI="http://id.worldcat.org/fast", valueURI="http://id.worldcat.org/fast/1206073")
Geographic
China
Record Information
Record Content Source (marcorg)
RPB
Record Creation Date (encoding="iso8601")
20150601
Language
Language Term: Code (ISO639-2B)
eng
Language Term: Text
English
Identifier: DOI
10.7301/Z02B8WFR
Access Condition: rights statement (href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/")
In Copyright
Access Condition: restriction on access
Collection is open for research.
Type of Resource (primo)
dissertations