Title Information
Title
The Biomatters of American Modernity
Name: Personal
Name Part
Hollingshead, David
Role
Role Term: Text
creator
Name: Personal
Name Part
Bewes, Timothy
Role
Role Term: Text
Reader
Name: Personal
Name Part
Gould, Philip
Role
Role Term: Text
Advisor
Name: Personal
Name Part
Nabers, Deak
Role
Role Term: Text
Reader
Name: Corporate
Name Part
Brown University. Department of English
Role
Role Term: Text
sponsor
Origin Information
Copyright Date
2018
Physical Description
Extent
vi, 282 p.
digitalOrigin
born digital
Note: thesis
Thesis (Ph. D.)--Brown University, 2018
Genre (aat)
theses
Abstract
My dissertation examines the relationship between aesthetic forms and the governance of life. I argue that the materially reductionist accounts of persons in realist and naturalist fiction—the “crawling yeast,” “elemental stuff,” and “protoplasmic” puddles that populate the works of Edith Wharton, Charles Chesnutt, Jack London, Frank Norris, Charlotte Perkins Gilman, and others—radically reimagined life as an object of political intervention. I call this new poetics of embodiment, in which life is rendered equivalent to sheer biological substrate, the biomaterial imagination. Whereas early nineteenth-century materialisms such as those of Poe or Shelley viewed such reductions as monstrous denaturings of humanity, artists and scientists at the fin-de-siècle had begun to view the human as itself constituted through an inhuman materiality that necessitated perpetual biopolitical administration. My chapters document the cross-pollinations between literary fiction and the culture of transatlantic science to show how questions of narrative form, representation, and textual circulation became entangled with understandings of the body’s productive and reproductive processes. Edith Wharton’s engagement with contemporary medical science and the ethics of euthanasia, Jack London’s writings on the American prison system and technologies of capital punishment, Charles Chesnutt’s work on tort law and the materialist doctrine of strict liability, as well as Frank Norris and Ellen Glasgow’s writings on germ theory and the public health movement constitute an underexamined archive of biopolitical thought that both sowed the imaginative seeds for the violent racial purification projects of the twentieth century and, in the same gesture, provoked new ways of theorizing the human that rejected the dream of purity at the level of race and species alike.
Subject
Topic
19th Century Prose Fiction
Subject (fast) (authorityURI="http://id.worldcat.org/fast", valueURI="http://id.worldcat.org/fast/00832668")
Topic
Biopolitics
Subject (fast) (authorityURI="http://id.worldcat.org/fast", valueURI="http://id.worldcat.org/fast/00807113")
Topic
American literature
Subject
Topic
african american literature
Subject (fast) (authorityURI="http://id.worldcat.org/fast", valueURI="http://id.worldcat.org/fast/01034541")
Topic
Naturalism in literature
Language
Language Term (ISO639-2B)
English
Record Information
Record Content Source (marcorg)
RPB
Record Creation Date (encoding="iso8601")
20180615
Identifier: DOI
10.26300/6n0v-8e04
Access Condition: rights statement (href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/")
In Copyright
Access Condition: restriction on access
Collection is open for research.
Type of Resource (primo)
dissertations