Title Information
Title
Rendering Justice: Media, Testimony, and Witnessing in the American Court of Public Opinion
Type of Resource (primo)
dissertations
Name: Personal
Name Part
Lawrence, Heather Thompson
Role
Role Term: Text
creator
Name: Personal
Name Part
Joyrich, Lynne
Role
Role Term: Text
Advisor
Name: Personal
Name Part
Koch, Gertrud
Role
Role Term: Text
Reader
Name: Personal
Name Part
Guterl, Matthew
Role
Role Term: Text
Reader
Name: Personal
Name Part
Mills, Mara
Role
Role Term: Text
Reader
Name: Corporate
Name Part
Brown University. Department of Modern Culture and Media
Role
Role Term: Text
sponsor
Origin Information
Copyright Date
2025
Physical Description
Extent
ix, 206 p.
digitalOrigin
born digital
Note: thesis
Thesis (Ph. D.)--Brown University, 2025
Genre (aat)
theses
Abstract
This dissertation contends that American society is currently witnessing the rise of what I have termed the jurified spectator: the individual media user who perceives their own judgment as having equal, if not more, legitimacy than the expertise of authorities (e.g., those in the courts, academic institutions, the fields of medicine and science, etc.) who have traditionally evaluated knowledge claims. This project theorizes the phenomenon of jurification by analyzing two distinct but interconnected areas of American culture: 1) the iconic image of the American jury trial as the ideal form for seeking justice and as the basis of the belief that the American public (as represented by a “jury of one’s peers”) serves as the ultimate source of judicial authority; and 2) the structures of digital and televisual media technologies that shape the way their users receive and communicate information. These two areas are linked by the concept of rendering—a term I propose to mark both the technological production of media representations and the socio-technological construction of meaning, new subject positions, and ultimately justice. Drawing from the fields of media and visual culture studies, African American and American studies, and feminist theory, this dissertation intervenes in some of the most pressing questions facing the trial’s role in American society today: What does it mean to seek justice? How is redress possible when some injuries and injured bodies are assigned different cultural value than others? Who is the ultimate arbiter of the trial’s narrative: the appointed jury or the spectating audience? Through its four structuring case studies—1) media mogul Alex Jones’ 2022 Sandy Hook conspiracy defamation trial; 2) amateur true crime media and the figure of the citizen sleuth; 3) QAnon and contemporary conspiracy media; and 4) the viral memes of Black Twitter—this dissertation offers a new study of the role of vision, narrative, and expertise in the project of seeking justice in the Information Age.
Subject
Topic
media theory
Subject (fast) (authorityURI="http://id.worldcat.org/fast", valueURI="http://id.worldcat.org/fast/00893716")
Topic
Digital media
Subject (fast) (authorityURI="http://id.worldcat.org/fast", valueURI="http://id.worldcat.org/fast/00922816")
Topic
Feminist theory
Subject
Topic
Racial justice
Subject (fast) (authorityURI="http://id.worldcat.org/fast", valueURI="http://id.worldcat.org/fast/01071344")
Topic
Popular culture
Subject
Topic
visual culture
Subject (fast) (authorityURI="http://id.worldcat.org/fast", valueURI="http://id.worldcat.org/fast/01399451")
Topic
American culture
Subject (fast) (authorityURI="http://id.worldcat.org/fast", valueURI="http://id.worldcat.org/fast/01403081")
Topic
True crime
Subject
Topic
trial narratives
Subject
Topic
conspiracy theory
Language
Language Term (ISO639-2B)
English
Record Information
Record Content Source (marcorg)
RPB
Record Creation Date (encoding="iso8601")
20250707