Title Information
Title
Can Civil Wars Improve Public Goods? Militias, Security, and Rural Governance in Post-Conflict Peru
Type of Resource (primo)
dissertations
Name: Personal
Name Part
Taccone, Nicolas
Role
Role Term: Text
creator
Name: Personal
Name Part
Snyder, Richard
Role
Role Term: Text
Advisor
Name: Personal
Name Part
Weitz-Shapiro, Rebecca
Role
Role Term: Text
Reader
Name: Personal
Name Part
Blair, Rob
Role
Role Term: Text
Reader
Name: Corporate
Name Part
Brown University. Department of Political Science
Role
Role Term: Text
sponsor
Origin Information
Copyright Date
2025
Physical Description
Extent
12, 220 p.
digitalOrigin
born digital
Note: thesis
Thesis (Ph. D.)--Brown University, 2025
Genre (aat)
theses
Abstract
This dissertation develops novel theoretical frameworks to trace the entire lifecycle of militias, from their formation during civil wars to their diverse post-conflict trajectories and effects on governance. By linking wartime territorial control to militia formation processes, I find that distinct types of militias emerge in different conflict zones. Grassroots militias tend to form “from below” in disputed territories, where communities organize to defend themselves from both insurgent and state violence. In contrast, state-orchestrated militias are created “from above” by the Armed Forces in former insurgent strongholds, where the state seeks to consolidate territorial control through top-down counterinsurgency strategies. I then examine how militias’ wartime relationships with the military and local communities shape their post-conflict paths. I identify three main trajectories: some militias disband, others persist and weaken rural governance, while others survive and strengthen it. The most intriguing trajectory, militias’ adoption of governance-enhancing roles post-conflict, is more likely to occur when these organizations maintain autonomy from the military and deep community ties during wartime. By protecting communities from civil war violence, militias earn social legitimacy and institutionalize, prompting their members and local villagers to repurpose them for post-conflict governance roles. Empirically, the dissertation draws on nine months of immersive fieldwork in rural Peru—including over 90 interviews, more than 3,000 formal and informal archival documents, and sustained participant observation. These site-intensive methods underpin a comparative historical analysis via process tracing of three subnational cases: the districts of Los Morochucos, Llochegua, and Luricocha—all located in Ayacucho, the epicenter of Peru’s internal armed conflict (1980-2000). My research contributes to debates on the inner workings of civil war and its historical legacies, particularly in relation to post-conflict governance. It highlights how wartime organizations can evolve into agents of stability in areas where the state remains weak, helping deliver public goods and services and thus improving the lives of historically marginalized populations.
Subject (fast) (authorityURI="http://id.worldcat.org/fast", valueURI="http://id.worldcat.org/fast/01205190")
Topic
Peru
Subject
Topic
civil war
Subject
Topic
Militias
Subject
Topic
Governance
Subject
Topic
Fieldwork
Language
Language Term (ISO639-2B)
English
Record Information
Record Content Source (marcorg)
RPB
Record Creation Date (encoding="iso8601")
20251201